Ok, so I’m fickle!
I wasn’t going to do this any more, I really wasn’t, but I love to talk, even with my fingers, so here I am again.
I post on a forum that comments on politics, etc, and I never fail to find some comment that just makes me scratch my head. I know, a lot of people who read my thoughts do the same thing, I’m sure, but since this is my blog, it’s my thoughts that are going to get written here. Anyway, the latest head-scratcher for me was a comment on how the Democrats are holding up the vote on Bolton as U.N. Ambassador simply to be mean to Bush. Now, I can see how they might want to believe that, but the fact is, if they are paying attention to what’s going on at all they would know that’s simply not the case. The Democrats have what they consider to be good reasons for concern and for waiting for more information about those concerns.
I guess there are several areas they are concerned about, not the least of which is his supposed inability to associate with his own staff and co-workers in any kind of diplomatic way. I mean, if he can’t be decent and get along with them, how is he to be expected to act with decorum towards representatives of governments we are already at odds with? My grandma always told me you can catch more flies with honey than you can with vinegar, and while at the time I wondered why on earth anyone would want to catch flies, I do understand it now. I think it applies quite well to diplomatic ventures, because if you keep alienating those you’re trying to reach some accord with you’re simply never going to get it done, and you are probably going to make things worse. We really need someone who can get the point across without smacking them in the face with it, then sneering at their less-than-diplomatic response in return. That’s not the way to win friends and influence people.
Now, while these tendencies he apparently has are disturbing, there is another area that seems to be even worse. Apparently he has asked for redacted copies of National Security Agency telephone intercepts that involve Government officials and then asked to know who those officials are. We all know that phone conversations are pretty much open to anyone who wants to hear them and who have the right equipment, so that’s not surprising. Neither is the fact that the names of those Government officials whose calls may have been intercepted have always been redacted from the written reports. People have always respected that since there are all kinds of inappropriate actions that could be taken against these people if their names were known, depending on what was said during the calls. However, Bolton seems to have made a habit of requesting the names, against all protocols, and then, the accusations go, he uses that information for his own purposes.
Is this true? We don’t know. What we do know is that the White House has files containing all the copies he’s requested, and all the names he’s asked to have revealed to him. All they have to do is hand those files over to the committee, let them see what’s true or false, and then a vote can be taken on him. However, the WH refuses to release them. One has to wonder why. What’s in those files that W doesn’t want the Senators to see? It seems to me that anytime there are refusals to make things like that public it usually means there’s something in there that will go against whomever is witholding them.
Now Senator Lott, not a Democrat by anyone’s reckoning, has said the WH should just hand the files over and let them see what’s there. He understands what the hangup is and says if the members of the committee are allowed to go over those files, a vote will be done, up or down. I don’t know about you, but when a member of the opposition as high up and powerful as Mr. Lott is gets on the bandwagon, it tells me that the Democrats are doing just the right thing by refusing to vote without knowing whether the charges made against the man are true or false. Obstruction? Not hardly, unless you are aiming the charge at the White House.





